"For all the shut down strangers and hot-rod angels,
rumbling through this promised land;
Tonight my baby and me are going to ride to the sea
and wash these sins off our hands"
Bruce Springsteen - Racing in the Streets
About that 113km... Theoretically, the real distance between the two cities is no more than 90km. However, I did cycle some 10km down the wrong road and have to turn back at the start of the day. I refuse to take more than half of the blame for this: San Antonio and Valparaiso, the two largest container ports in Chile, you would have thought there would be ample signs between the two towns showing the way, but there aren't, at least not until you are so far down the right road that you can't get anywhere but Valparaiso. Knowing that I had to go towards Santiago part of the way I followed the signs that said Santiago and, well, you can work the rest out yourselves. I should have checked the map better I guess, particularly given that in Chile all roads literally lead to Santiago (they've got signs for Santiago as far south as Puerto Montt, but heaven forbid they should think of having signs to Valparaiso a mere 90km down the road).
The bizarre thing about this is the distance shown in the distance grid on my map is 112km (oh how I laughed when I looked at it, checked the distances on the map and thought "that's way off!"), which can only mean one of two things: 1) They worked out the distance using an old route that happened to be the same as my odyssey yesterday. 2) They have made allowances for the idiot factor and assumed that people will go the wrong way for roughly the same distance as I did before realising (which, if true, as the smarter ones among you will have realised, means that I am 0.975km slower than your average idiot, but we shan't dwell on that).
The episode only served to prove how deceptive time can be on a bike though, for the most part it is slow, almost unimaginably so (as a rough guide: one hour by car = a day's cycling), but you cycle a mere 20 minutes down the wrong road and your day is lengthened by 25%. Add to that the fact that today was by far the most I've climbed in a day (the accumulated climb feature on my watch has a mind of its own, so I can't say it's reliable, but by the end of the day the figure had doubled from the previous day), and the result is some spectacular saddle-sores, sufficed it to say that they were that bad that putting cold E45 on it felt like they were being rubbed with sandpaper.
Regardless, Valparaiso is no mean milestone and even though it does constitute shameless self-backslapping, with eight weeks and 1600km behind me I'm sure you won't begrudge my indulging in a little retrospective. I suppose the one of the things you're all wondering is would I have done anything differently. Where do I start? I would have liked to have spent more time in the far south, perhaps done some of the Carretera Austral; I should have definitely gone to Chiloe; I could have spent more time in the Lakes region, perhaps even crossed to Bariloche; I could have gotten a bus from Temuco or Chillán to here to give me more time for the rest of the trip; I could have camped more (or at all)... I could literally go on all day, but I guess (nay hope) that most of my regrets are the fruit of hindsight and not outright bad decision making, so it's pointless to be second-guessing myself now. And I use the term "regrets" very loosely, because although part of me thinks I should have done some things differently, another part wouldn't change a single kilometer, a single puncture, a single rank B&B, a single red-raw saddle sore. As Douglas Adams wrote: "I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be".
rumbling through this promised land;
Tonight my baby and me are going to ride to the sea
and wash these sins off our hands"
Bruce Springsteen - Racing in the Streets
About that 113km... Theoretically, the real distance between the two cities is no more than 90km. However, I did cycle some 10km down the wrong road and have to turn back at the start of the day. I refuse to take more than half of the blame for this: San Antonio and Valparaiso, the two largest container ports in Chile, you would have thought there would be ample signs between the two towns showing the way, but there aren't, at least not until you are so far down the right road that you can't get anywhere but Valparaiso. Knowing that I had to go towards Santiago part of the way I followed the signs that said Santiago and, well, you can work the rest out yourselves. I should have checked the map better I guess, particularly given that in Chile all roads literally lead to Santiago (they've got signs for Santiago as far south as Puerto Montt, but heaven forbid they should think of having signs to Valparaiso a mere 90km down the road).
The bizarre thing about this is the distance shown in the distance grid on my map is 112km (oh how I laughed when I looked at it, checked the distances on the map and thought "that's way off!"), which can only mean one of two things: 1) They worked out the distance using an old route that happened to be the same as my odyssey yesterday. 2) They have made allowances for the idiot factor and assumed that people will go the wrong way for roughly the same distance as I did before realising (which, if true, as the smarter ones among you will have realised, means that I am 0.975km slower than your average idiot, but we shan't dwell on that).
The episode only served to prove how deceptive time can be on a bike though, for the most part it is slow, almost unimaginably so (as a rough guide: one hour by car = a day's cycling), but you cycle a mere 20 minutes down the wrong road and your day is lengthened by 25%. Add to that the fact that today was by far the most I've climbed in a day (the accumulated climb feature on my watch has a mind of its own, so I can't say it's reliable, but by the end of the day the figure had doubled from the previous day), and the result is some spectacular saddle-sores, sufficed it to say that they were that bad that putting cold E45 on it felt like they were being rubbed with sandpaper.
Regardless, Valparaiso is no mean milestone and even though it does constitute shameless self-backslapping, with eight weeks and 1600km behind me I'm sure you won't begrudge my indulging in a little retrospective. I suppose the one of the things you're all wondering is would I have done anything differently. Where do I start? I would have liked to have spent more time in the far south, perhaps done some of the Carretera Austral; I should have definitely gone to Chiloe; I could have spent more time in the Lakes region, perhaps even crossed to Bariloche; I could have gotten a bus from Temuco or Chillán to here to give me more time for the rest of the trip; I could have camped more (or at all)... I could literally go on all day, but I guess (nay hope) that most of my regrets are the fruit of hindsight and not outright bad decision making, so it's pointless to be second-guessing myself now. And I use the term "regrets" very loosely, because although part of me thinks I should have done some things differently, another part wouldn't change a single kilometer, a single puncture, a single rank B&B, a single red-raw saddle sore. As Douglas Adams wrote: "I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be".

